You got those posh energizers in there, huh?
Les Paul v 335 - can you really hear the difference?
Moderators: Slowy, Capt. Black
- Polar Bear
- Burns BHM
- Posts: 6305
- meble-kuchenne.warszawa.pl
- Joined: Wed Sep 10, 2003 12:53 am
- Location: Wellington
- Has liked: 340 times
- Been liked: 342 times
Re: Les Paul v 335 - can you really hear the difference?
Zephyr - Wellington's Leading Covers Band
http://zephyrband.co.nz/
https://www.facebook.com/ZephyrBandNZ
http://zephyrband.co.nz/
https://www.facebook.com/ZephyrBandNZ
- codedog
- Vintage Post Junkie
- Posts: 6740
- Joined: Wed Jun 11, 2014 8:44 pm
- Location: Christchurch
- Has liked: 3486 times
- Been liked: 1088 times
Re: Les Paul v 335 - can you really hear the difference?
That raises the question... what did your friend replace them with?mr_sooty wrote: ↑Tue Feb 23, 2021 1:17 pmOff a friend. The pickups are worth more than the guitar. It's a travesty.codedog wrote: ↑Tue Feb 23, 2021 11:54 amOh wow, where did you get those from? I thought they're only available in True Historics or some other equally elite Gibson models?mr_sooty wrote: ↑Tue Feb 23, 2021 10:21 am As I don't have either guitar (I have a pretty good LP knockoff with Custombuckers, but I have never owned a 335) you're in a better position to argue this than me. I have played both, but mostly my thoughts on the subject come from hypothetical theory and listening to comparison videos. So I am debating this while acknowledging that you would know better, but still...
- mr_sooty
- Vintage Post Junkie
- Posts: 4948
- Joined: Mon Apr 28, 2008 9:20 am
- Location: Paraparaumu, NZ.
- Has liked: 60 times
- Been liked: 178 times
Re: Les Paul v 335 - can you really hear the difference?
I actually don't know, he has several Historics - I'm not sure why he had a spare set of Custombuckers.
- codedog
- Vintage Post Junkie
- Posts: 6740
- Joined: Wed Jun 11, 2014 8:44 pm
- Location: Christchurch
- Has liked: 3486 times
- Been liked: 1088 times
Re: Les Paul v 335 - can you really hear the difference?
That line is perfect for a "You know you've made it when..." meme!
- Slowy
- Vintage Post Junkie
- Posts: 22787
- Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 4:13 pm
- Location: Orcland
- Has liked: 1018 times
- Been liked: 2482 times
Re: Les Paul v 335 - can you really hear the difference?
But you were issued with professional ears.
Beyond a critical point within a finite space, freedom diminishes as numbers increase. This is as true of humans as it is of gas molecules in a sealed flask. The human question is not how many can possibly survive within the system, but what kind of existence is possible for those who so survive.
- mr_sooty
- Vintage Post Junkie
- Posts: 4948
- Joined: Mon Apr 28, 2008 9:20 am
- Location: Paraparaumu, NZ.
- Has liked: 60 times
- Been liked: 178 times
Re: Les Paul v 335 - can you really hear the difference?
I just listened again with my stereo monitors? Seriously... a pretty significant difference? Enough to declare one a more versatile guitar than the other? OK man I know you're a proffesional studio engineer with probably a much better ear than me, so I will bow to your expertise... what I'm really asking myself is can I hear anything that gives the 335 away as a hollowbody guitar, and honestly, I can't. I know I have some hearing deterioration from working in music shops and playing in bands, but I don't think it's THAT bad.
- codedog
- Vintage Post Junkie
- Posts: 6740
- Joined: Wed Jun 11, 2014 8:44 pm
- Location: Christchurch
- Has liked: 3486 times
- Been liked: 1088 times
Re: Les Paul v 335 - can you really hear the difference?
Wow... ok...
I guess your job as an audio engineer meant you have a trained "palate"....
- jeremyb
- Chorus of Organs
- Posts: 41113
- Joined: Sat Dec 06, 2008 9:03 am
- Has liked: 7724 times
- Been liked: 4169 times
Re: Les Paul v 335 - can you really hear the difference?
I guessed it right too, the 335 was just brighter and with more presence, my experience of les pauls are they're a bit lacking in the trebbelz and upper mids.... YMMV etc..
Slowy wrote: That's the problem; everything rewarding is just such hard work. Regret takes much less effort.
- bender
- Darth Fader
- Posts: 11848
- Joined: Fri Feb 02, 2007 12:46 pm
- Location: Dorkland
- Has liked: 415 times
- Been liked: 1010 times
Re: Les Paul v 335 - can you really hear the difference?
I mean, I've spent over 20 years being paid to listen to stuff, so I guess that's accurate? Can I please use a different word though? "Palate" makes me want to spew.
- bender
- Darth Fader
- Posts: 11848
- Joined: Fri Feb 02, 2007 12:46 pm
- Location: Dorkland
- Has liked: 415 times
- Been liked: 1010 times
Re: Les Paul v 335 - can you really hear the difference?
Wow, that's a lot to unpack.mr_sooty wrote: ↑Tue Feb 23, 2021 4:42 pmI just listened again with my stereo monitors? Seriously... a pretty significant difference? Enough to declare one a more versatile guitar than the other? OK man I know you're a proffesional studio engineer with probably a much better ear than me, so I will bow to your expertise... what I'm really asking myself is can I hear anything that gives the 335 away as a hollowbody guitar, and honestly, I can't. I know I have some hearing deterioration from working in music shops and playing in bands, but I don't think it's THAT bad.
Yes. I can hear a significant difference.
It's not a sonic difference that would make me declare that one is more versatile than the other.
The main difference I can hear is in the dynamic response, particularly around the midrange. To me, it fits with my experience of playing hollow body and semi hollow guitars. I heard the same difference in character across all three switch positions.
Playing in bands will very quickly affect your upper midrange and high frequency response, unless you wear hearing protection with a minimum rating of around 15dB. In Ear monitors can be good for minimising SPL to your ears, but they can also be an accelerant.
I think you've missed the point about why a 335 is considered a more versatile guitar- it's more likely to be how they feel/sound to the player than how they sound when recorded. I'm basing that assumption on the fact that it's predominantly session guitarists who make that claim (rather than audio engineers).
I've always looked for guitars that feel 'lively', and almost all of the ones I've found that do are either semi-hollow, chambered, or a really lightweight and resonant wood (Paulownia and chambered swamp ash). I really miss my old chambered swamp ash Robin- it was really plain looking, but so damn good to play (and it always sounded awesome). The Paulownia Tele comes close to that.
- rickenbackerkid
- Vintage Post Junkie
- Posts: 6713
- Joined: Thu Apr 28, 2005 1:52 pm
- Has liked: 208 times
- Been liked: 653 times
Re: Les Paul v 335 - can you really hear the difference?
Terrible. Also the player doesn't own a tuner, and the tone of guitar one is mostly just strings slapping against frets. Action on that thing must be crazy ridiculously low.
- Jay
- Vintage Post Junkie
- Posts: 7793
- Joined: Sat Sep 25, 2010 9:35 pm
- Has liked: 1633 times
- Been liked: 1297 times
Re: Les Paul v 335 - can you really hear the difference?
Reading what you guys can hear makes me think that my hearing is way worse than I thought it was
When faced with quality, I recognise it every time.
- robthemac
- Vintage Post Junkie
- Posts: 8618
- Joined: Sun Apr 28, 2019 3:47 pm
- Has liked: 1105 times
- Been liked: 1422 times
Re: Les Paul v 335 - can you really hear the difference?
Don't. I don't have any significant hearing loss, and even listening on TOTL studio IEMs, I couldn't tell which was which. The differences were subtle at best. I think Ben's right in that with experience or training (or perhaps a few genetically gifted folk) a significant difference could be heard, but I doubt many people can. Especially on phone speakers.
Last edited by robthemac on Tue Feb 23, 2021 10:26 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- mr_sooty
- Vintage Post Junkie
- Posts: 4948
- Joined: Mon Apr 28, 2008 9:20 am
- Location: Paraparaumu, NZ.
- Has liked: 60 times
- Been liked: 178 times
Re: Les Paul v 335 - can you really hear the difference?
I assume you mean 'couldn't'? Just guessing based on the general tone of your post.
I also worked as an audio engineer, just in radio but I was pretty reasonable at it, and I've been working in music retail a long time specialising in guitars, so I would think I would have SOME idea. But I do have a bit of high end hearing loss and some tinnitus so it's quite possible I'm just missing some of the detail others are hearing. But hearing aside, I'm just not sure there would be much of a difference scientifically. Because the pickups are mounted on solid wood, how much could the hollow bits stuck on either side of the block actually change what the pickup....picks up? A fully hollow guitar for sure, that's a whole different thing.