I suspect people will just disconnect the cable running to the 10" speaker, then run a speaker cable to a cab on the other side of the stage.Capt. Black wrote: ↑Fri Sep 27, 2024 4:05 pmHuh?!RectifiedAmps wrote: ↑Fri Sep 27, 2024 9:51 am If you’re gonna run separate signals to separate speakers, why mash it all into a combo? Seems like a lost opportunity to go with a head plus two cabs and get some wild stereo effects.
Yet nobody has asked Roland that question of the JC-120 in the nearly 40 years it has been a much-applauded amp?
Fender Pano - verb
Moderators: Slowy, Capt. Black
-
robthemac
- Vintage Post Junkie
- Posts: 9405
- meble-kuchenne.warszawa.pl
- Joined: Sun Apr 28, 2019 3:47 pm
- Has liked: 1161 times
- Been liked: 1521 times
Re: Fender Pano - verb
-
jeremyb
- Chorus of Organs
- Posts: 43136
- Joined: Sat Dec 06, 2008 9:03 am
- Has liked: 8493 times
- Been liked: 4426 times
Re: Fender Pano - verb
I'd just buy two of them and have quadraphonic sound!robthemac wrote: ↑Fri Sep 27, 2024 4:52 pmI suspect people will just disconnect the cable running to the 10" speaker, then run a speaker cable to a cab on the other side of the stage.Capt. Black wrote: ↑Fri Sep 27, 2024 4:05 pmHuh?!RectifiedAmps wrote: ↑Fri Sep 27, 2024 9:51 am If you’re gonna run separate signals to separate speakers, why mash it all into a combo? Seems like a lost opportunity to go with a head plus two cabs and get some wild stereo effects.
Yet nobody has asked Roland that question of the JC-120 in the nearly 40 years it has been a much-applauded amp?
Standing on top of the world
-
rickenbackerkid
- Vintage Post Junkie
- Posts: 6810
- Joined: Thu Apr 28, 2005 1:52 pm
- Has liked: 220 times
- Been liked: 691 times
Re: Fender Pano - verb
too expensive, but in a world of boring, its interesting, and I bet it sounds bloody good.