Hmm it was working
Amp gurus , PT questions and others...
Moderators: Slowy, Capt. Black
- StrummersOfThunder
- Vintage Post Junkie
- Posts: 8020
- meble-kuchenne.warszawa.pl
- Joined: Sun Jul 15, 2012 2:23 pm
- Has liked: 1017 times
- Been liked: 1615 times
- StrummersOfThunder
- Vintage Post Junkie
- Posts: 8020
- Joined: Sun Jul 15, 2012 2:23 pm
- Has liked: 1017 times
- Been liked: 1615 times
- Jay
- Vintage Post Junkie
- Posts: 8222
- Joined: Sat Sep 25, 2010 9:35 pm
- Has liked: 1795 times
- Been liked: 1469 times
Re: Amp gurus , PT questions and others...
Check out the specs for the valve re bias voltage range. The range will be wider than 3V so both your values will be okay
- RectifiedAmps
- Fender
- Posts: 565
- Joined: Tue Jul 22, 2014 7:05 am
- Location: Wellington
- Has liked: 243 times
- Been liked: 288 times
Re: Amp gurus , PT questions and others...
If it’s cathode biased you won’t be using the 50v tap, so it’s irrelevant.
I’m not sure it’s the PT causing sag in this case. Usually a sagging PT is under a pretty heavy current draw (relative to its rating). Sag/compression is usually a combination of self-regulation from cathode biasing, sometimes power supply caps that are underrated (5-10uf in high power amps), and often series resistance in the power supply (a bit in the PT, a lot in a valve rectifier (if you had one), then any dropping resistors between the PT output and the supply nodes). Low efficiency speakers also cause compression, which might be the case here, since you don’t have the volume up high enough to suspect current-limiting compression.
The replacement PT should be fine. 6vac difference won’t amount to anything significant. Remember the voltage coming out of the wall can often vary by as much as 10VAC, which would mean ANY PT output could vary by >25vac on a day-to-day basis.
I’m not sure it’s the PT causing sag in this case. Usually a sagging PT is under a pretty heavy current draw (relative to its rating). Sag/compression is usually a combination of self-regulation from cathode biasing, sometimes power supply caps that are underrated (5-10uf in high power amps), and often series resistance in the power supply (a bit in the PT, a lot in a valve rectifier (if you had one), then any dropping resistors between the PT output and the supply nodes). Low efficiency speakers also cause compression, which might be the case here, since you don’t have the volume up high enough to suspect current-limiting compression.
The replacement PT should be fine. 6vac difference won’t amount to anything significant. Remember the voltage coming out of the wall can often vary by as much as 10VAC, which would mean ANY PT output could vary by >25vac on a day-to-day basis.
- StrummersOfThunder
- Vintage Post Junkie
- Posts: 8020
- Joined: Sun Jul 15, 2012 2:23 pm
- Has liked: 1017 times
- Been liked: 1615 times
Re: Amp gurus , PT questions and others...
Thanks for that , super helpfulRectifiedAmps wrote: ↑Wed Aug 21, 2024 9:05 am If it’s cathode biased you won’t be using the 50v tap, so it’s irrelevant.
I’m not sure it’s the PT causing sag in this case. Usually a sagging PT is under a pretty heavy current draw (relative to its rating). Sag/compression is usually a combination of self-regulation from cathode biasing, sometimes power supply caps that are underrated (5-10uf in high power amps), and often series resistance in the power supply (a bit in the PT, a lot in a valve rectifier (if you had one), then any dropping resistors between the PT output and the supply nodes). Low efficiency speakers also cause compression, which might be the case here, since you don’t have the volume up high enough to suspect current-limiting compression.
The replacement PT should be fine. 6vac difference won’t amount to anything significant. Remember the voltage coming out of the wall can often vary by as much as 10VAC, which would mean ANY PT output could vary by >25vac on a day-to-day basis.
Like is said , I might not be explaining what I’m hearing that well
I think I’m going to grab a Hammond super reverb PT that has 710vac 300ma and go from there
Agree the 50v/53v is irrelevant just wondered about it as an aside
- StrummersOfThunder
- Vintage Post Junkie
- Posts: 8020
- Joined: Sun Jul 15, 2012 2:23 pm
- Has liked: 1017 times
- Been liked: 1615 times
Re: Amp gurus , PT questions and others...
ok ive done some measurements off the PT, B+, output tubes and preamp tube to normal channel
I havent drawn the schematic yet but plan to during the weekend
Like I said, it appears to be one preamp tube short, but i wonder if there is sime sharing of an unused half some where.
Will try and photos again too.
From measurements compared to stock schematic it appears that there is higher voltage as expected by the increased PT VAC (360 vs 330 stock)
trans former 2ndry 360v ac
pins 3 + 4 output tubes 468v 470v
bias voltage pin 5 = 37v
phase inv pins 1 = 300v 6 = 290
preamp tube from notmal (12ax7) pin 1= 260v 3 = 1.9v 6 =260v
first node after 100k resistor off pin 1 of preamp 12ax7 for normal ch = 406v
B+of cap can 460v
I havent drawn the schematic yet but plan to during the weekend
Like I said, it appears to be one preamp tube short, but i wonder if there is sime sharing of an unused half some where.
Will try and photos again too.
From measurements compared to stock schematic it appears that there is higher voltage as expected by the increased PT VAC (360 vs 330 stock)
trans former 2ndry 360v ac
pins 3 + 4 output tubes 468v 470v
bias voltage pin 5 = 37v
phase inv pins 1 = 300v 6 = 290
preamp tube from notmal (12ax7) pin 1= 260v 3 = 1.9v 6 =260v
first node after 100k resistor off pin 1 of preamp 12ax7 for normal ch = 406v
B+of cap can 460v
- StrummersOfThunder
- Vintage Post Junkie
- Posts: 8020
- Joined: Sun Jul 15, 2012 2:23 pm
- Has liked: 1017 times
- Been liked: 1615 times
- StrummersOfThunder
- Vintage Post Junkie
- Posts: 8020
- Joined: Sun Jul 15, 2012 2:23 pm
- Has liked: 1017 times
- Been liked: 1615 times
- StrummersOfThunder
- Vintage Post Junkie
- Posts: 8020
- Joined: Sun Jul 15, 2012 2:23 pm
- Has liked: 1017 times
- Been liked: 1615 times
Re: Amp gurus , PT questions and others...
is that plate voltage gonna be ok?StrummersOfThunder wrote: ↑Sat Aug 24, 2024 9:13 am ok ive done some measurements off the PT, B+, output tubes and preamp tube to normal channel
I havent drawn the schematic yet but plan to during the weekend
Like I said, it appears to be one preamp tube short, but i wonder if there is sime sharing of an unused half some where.
Will try and photos again too.
From measurements compared to stock schematic it appears that there is higher voltage as expected by the increased PT VAC (360 vs 330 stock)
trans former 2ndry 360v ac
pins 3 + 4 output tubes 468v 470v
bias voltage pin 5 = 37v
phase inv pins 1 = 300v 6 = 290
preamp tube from notmal (12ax7) pin 1= 260v 3 = 1.9v 6 =260v
first node after 100k resistor off pin 1 of preamp 12ax7 for normal ch = 406v
B+of cap can 460v
- MikeC
- Vintage Post Junkie
- Posts: 3472
- Joined: Fri Sep 12, 2003 5:43 pm
- Location: Red Beach, Auckland
- Has liked: 1528 times
- Been liked: 1081 times
Re: Amp gurus , PT questions and others...
Specs say 300V max on 12ax7 plate. 406V too high.
Whakanuia o mea kei a koe
- StrummersOfThunder
- Vintage Post Junkie
- Posts: 8020
- Joined: Sun Jul 15, 2012 2:23 pm
- Has liked: 1017 times
- Been liked: 1615 times
Re: Amp gurus , PT questions and others...
Not overly surprising given the transformer specs etc
So will this just burn through tubes ?
Voltages on the output tubes ok?
- MikeC
- Vintage Post Junkie
- Posts: 3472
- Joined: Fri Sep 12, 2003 5:43 pm
- Location: Red Beach, Auckland
- Has liked: 1528 times
- Been liked: 1081 times
Re: Amp gurus , PT questions and others...
Specs says 300V max. Exceed (by miles) at your peril.StrummersOfThunder wrote: ↑Sun Aug 25, 2024 7:43 amNot overly surprising given the transformer specs etc
So will this just burn through tubes ?
Whakanuia o mea kei a koe
- MikeC
- Vintage Post Junkie
- Posts: 3472
- Joined: Fri Sep 12, 2003 5:43 pm
- Location: Red Beach, Auckland
- Has liked: 1528 times
- Been liked: 1081 times
Re: Amp gurus , PT questions and others...
Plate voltages are fine for 6L6 tubes but who knows what they are dissipating at idle until measured. The cathode resistor is mostly controlling this.
Whakanuia o mea kei a koe
- StrummersOfThunder
- Vintage Post Junkie
- Posts: 8020
- Joined: Sun Jul 15, 2012 2:23 pm
- Has liked: 1017 times
- Been liked: 1615 times
Re: Amp gurus , PT questions and others...
To be clear thats the voltage after the 100k resistor . Fender calls it 390vMikeC wrote: ↑Sun Aug 25, 2024 7:48 amSpecs says 300V max. Exceed (by miles) at your peril.StrummersOfThunder wrote: ↑Sun Aug 25, 2024 7:43 amNot overly surprising given the transformer specs etc
So will this just burn through tubes ?
The voltage on pin 1 is 260v on the dot
- StrummersOfThunder
- Vintage Post Junkie
- Posts: 8020
- Joined: Sun Jul 15, 2012 2:23 pm
- Has liked: 1017 times
- Been liked: 1615 times