I hate exchange rates. My dream Lowden in my chosen wood combination has now become stratospherically unaffordable.
Beautiful, but I wonder about the longevity of that bridge design
What aspect of the design in particular made you wonder?
In that closeup bridge shot, once the string leaves the saddle towards the hole in the bridge, it appears that there is a break angle, ie resulting in string friction in the hole, ie wear.
The other thing that I wonder, is if a horizontal crack would develop between the 'end ball' holes, the string tension might just rip the top off that bridge section.
I am sure Mr Lowden's engineers have faith in it, but will it last 50 plus years?
When faced with quality, I recognise it every time.
Beautiful, but I wonder about the longevity of that bridge design
What aspect of the design in particular made you wonder?
In that closeup bridge shot, once the string leaves the saddle towards the hole in the bridge, it appears that there is a break angle, ie resulting in string friction in the hole, ie wear.
The other thing that I wonder, is if a horizontal crack would develop between the 'end ball' holes, the string tension might just rip the top off that bridge section.
I am sure Mr Lowden's engineers have faith in it, but will it last 50 plus years?
That's pretty much how my Breedlove bridge was designed, albeit a fraction of the cost.
Beautiful, but I wonder about the longevity of that bridge design
What aspect of the design in particular made you wonder?
In that closeup bridge shot, once the string leaves the saddle towards the hole in the bridge, it appears that there is a break angle, ie resulting in string friction in the hole, ie wear.
The other thing that I wonder, is if a horizontal crack would develop between the 'end ball' holes, the string tension might just rip the top off that bridge section.
I am sure Mr Lowden's engineers have faith in it, but will it last 50 plus years?
I think it will, the design dates to the early 80s, I've not heard of any complaints or concerns so far.
What aspect of the design in particular made you wonder?
In that closeup bridge shot, once the string leaves the saddle towards the hole in the bridge, it appears that there is a break angle, ie resulting in string friction in the hole, ie wear.
The other thing that I wonder, is if a horizontal crack would develop between the 'end ball' holes, the string tension might just rip the top off that bridge section.
I am sure Mr Lowden's engineers have faith in it, but will it last 50 plus years?
That's pretty much how my Breedlove bridge was designed, albeit a fraction of the cost.
That Breedlove is an excellent instrument, no corners were cut in its manufacture.
Most of the Breedloves I have had ,had a bridge doctor bracing system underneath the bridge fitted as standard, though that one doesnt seem to have one. Ovation have also used a pinless bridge forever on their guitars with no issues.
vinylguy wrote: ↑Tue Mar 14, 2023 5:59 am
Most of the Breedloves I have had ,had a bridge doctor bracing system underneath the bridge fitted as standard, though that one doesnt seem to have one. Ovation have also used a pinless bridge forever on their guitars with no issues.
Jay wrote: ↑Mon Mar 13, 2023 8:28 pm
What aspect of the design in particular made you wonder?
In that closeup bridge shot, once the string leaves the saddle towards the hole in the bridge, it appears that there is a break angle, ie resulting in string friction in the hole, ie wear.
The other thing that I wonder, is if a horizontal crack would develop between the 'end ball' holes, the string tension might just rip the top off that bridge section.
I am sure Mr Lowden's engineers have faith in it, but will it last 50 plus years?
[/quote]
To fair my Lowden is 35 years old, original bridge and no issue. I think it will do 50 years no sweat. Lowdens have a low string tension compared to other guitars, mostly because of that bridge.
I found my Martin's Japanese half sister yesterday.
20230402_110430.jpg (2.24 MiB) Viewed 3258 times
20230402_110455.jpg (3.31 MiB) Viewed 3258 times
1970s G.J Gould TH-2500 D-35 copy. All solid wood, It's in better condition and made from nicer looking woods than my Martin, there's probably some analogy to be made there between American and Japanese women too.
1935 Martin D-45, 1942 Gibson Southern Jumbo,1950 Fender Broadcaster, 1954 Fender Strat, 1958 Gibson Moderne prototype, 1959 Gibson Les Paul Standard.
1958 Fender twin, 1965 Vox AC30, 1966 Marshall JTM 45, 1977 Dumble OD Special.
Big black garbage bag full of original Klon Centaurs and TS808s.
Had a play on a Big Bay Taylor. Quite impressed with the neck feel, almost like an electric and despite it being a bold on. Smaller body still projects loud enough and very balanced. Looks budget but once you play it that is easily forgotten. Now why don't the Rockshop have these on special?
When faced with quality, I recognise it every time.
Jay wrote: ↑Fri Apr 14, 2023 4:41 pm
Had a play on a Big Bay Taylor. Quite impressed with the neck feel, almost like an electric and despite it being a bold on. Smaller body still projects loud enough and very balanced. Looks budget but once you play it that is easily forgotten. Now why don't the Rockshop have these on special?
Yes, they are fun guitars, and give a surprisingly good sound. I think the GS-Minis are better, in terms of fun and overall tonal balance.
Jay wrote: ↑Fri Apr 14, 2023 4:41 pm
Had a play on a Big Bay Taylor. Quite impressed with the neck feel, almost like an electric and despite it being a bold on. Smaller body still projects loud enough and very balanced. Looks budget but once you play it that is easily forgotten. Now why don't the Rockshop have these on special?
Yes, they are fun guitars, and give a surprisingly good sound. I think the GS-Minis are better, in terms of fun and overall tonal balance.
At twice the price though. There's one on TM right now but I just realised is has a 4 piece top. Unusual?
When faced with quality, I recognise it every time.
Jay wrote: ↑Fri Apr 14, 2023 4:41 pm
Had a play on a Big Bay Taylor. Quite impressed with the neck feel, almost like an electric and despite it being a bold on. Smaller body still projects loud enough and very balanced. Looks budget but once you play it that is easily forgotten. Now why don't the Rockshop have these on special?
Yes, they are fun guitars, and give a surprisingly good sound. I think the GS-Minis are better, in terms of fun and overall tonal balance.
At twice the price though. There's one on TM right now but I just realised is has a 4 piece top. Unusual?
I thought so.
Beyond a critical point within a finite space, freedom diminishes as numbers increase. This is as true of humans as it is of gas molecules in a sealed flask. The human question is not how many can possibly survive within the system, but what kind of existence is possible for those who so survive.
I played a GS mini in Koa at the RS in dunners and thought they were a great little guitar. I think they are laminate not solid wood though ? Im watching that one on TM too just in case my Martin sells....