Return of the Gibson shocker thread!

All things guitar, Les Pauls, Strats, Teles, Tokai, Ibanez etc. etc. etc.

Moderators: Slowy, Capt. Black

Post Reply
User avatar
jeremyb
Chorus of Organs
Posts: 32881
meble-kuchenne.warszawa.pl
Joined: Sat Dec 06, 2008 9:03 am
Has liked: 5250 times
Been liked: 2841 times

Return of the Gibson shocker thread!

Post by jeremyb »

Gutted the old one has gone.... anyways, I present for you, new for 1914, I mean 2014!

http://www2.gibson.com/Products/Electri ... rding.aspx
Polar Bear wrote: It will continue to be a mystery as to why this is such a sausage fest.

User avatar
GrantB
ADMIN
Posts: 14441
Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2003 9:04 am
Location: Where I need to be
Has liked: 968 times
Been liked: 1704 times
Contact:

Post by GrantB »

Gibson have gone to frets over binding to cut costs. That exec should be fired.
"Man is the most insane species. He worships an invisible god and destroys a visible nature. Unaware that this nature he's destroying is this god he's worshipping." - Hubert Reeves

User avatar
Bg
Site Admin
Posts: 39510
Joined: Fri Sep 05, 2003 12:13 am
Location: Auckland
Has liked: 1911 times
Been liked: 3081 times

Re: Return of the Gibson shocker thread!

Post by Bg »

I quite like that :)
So, is that low alcohol or no alcohol at all? mmmm, no alcohol, do you want to try it? Noooooooooo.

User avatar
Bg
Site Admin
Posts: 39510
Joined: Fri Sep 05, 2003 12:13 am
Location: Auckland
Has liked: 1911 times
Been liked: 3081 times

Re:

Post by Bg »

*UNIQUE* wrote:Gibson have gone to frets over binding to cut costs. That exec should be fired.
thats the shocker....
So, is that low alcohol or no alcohol at all? mmmm, no alcohol, do you want to try it? Noooooooooo.

twistedthoughts
Vintage Post Junkie
Vintage Post Junkie
Posts: 1353
Joined: Tue Aug 15, 2006 9:23 am
Location: Christchurch
Has liked: 7 times

Re:

Post by twistedthoughts »

*UNIQUE* wrote:Gibson have gone to frets over binding to cut costs. That exec should be fired.
What in the name of all fuck is that about???

User avatar
jeremyb
Chorus of Organs
Posts: 32881
Joined: Sat Dec 06, 2008 9:03 am
Has liked: 5250 times
Been liked: 2841 times

Re:

Post by jeremyb »

*UNIQUE* wrote:Gibson have gone to frets over binding to cut costs. That exec should be fired.
Seriously??? Why even bother with the binding then!
Polar Bear wrote: It will continue to be a mystery as to why this is such a sausage fest.

User avatar
Slowy
Vintage Post Junkie
Vintage Post Junkie
Posts: 18835
Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 4:13 pm
Location: Orcland
Has liked: 733 times
Been liked: 1825 times

Re: Return of the Gibson shocker thread!

Post by Slowy »

I bought one of those when I was 14. Didn't have a Bigsby but it cost me $320 second hand. It was the only Gibson cheap enough for me to afford. I played it through a hideous home made S/S amp and to this day, I have no idea what it really sounded like.

Swapped it for a drum kit when I was 16. Dumb move, regret it. :(
"We were playing so loud that just one note on the guitar was sufficient".
Ritchie Blackmore.

twistedthoughts
Vintage Post Junkie
Vintage Post Junkie
Posts: 1353
Joined: Tue Aug 15, 2006 9:23 am
Location: Christchurch
Has liked: 7 times

Re: Return of the Gibson shocker thread!

Post by twistedthoughts »

slowfingers wrote:I bought one of those when I was 14. Didn't have a Bigsby but it cost me $320 second hand. It was the only Gibson cheap enough for me to afford. I played it through a hideous home made S/S amp and to this day, I have no idea what it really sounded like.

Swapped it for a drum kit when I was 16. Dumb move, regret it. :(
Bro - have you seen what those look like?

I'd rather put some strings on a kick drum and play that.

User avatar
bobiron
Vintage Post Junkie
Vintage Post Junkie
Posts: 1066
Joined: Wed Nov 10, 2004 9:04 am
Location: Silverdale - Auckland
Has liked: 112 times
Been liked: 45 times

Re: Return of the Gibson shocker thread!

Post by bobiron »

i like this concept and the look, never played one though, but heard Les use his and it sounded great.
OMM OM MM OMM MM

User avatar
GrantB
ADMIN
Posts: 14441
Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2003 9:04 am
Location: Where I need to be
Has liked: 968 times
Been liked: 1704 times
Contact:

Re: Return of the Gibson shocker thread!

Post by GrantB »

twistedthoughts wrote: I'd rather put some strings on a kick drum and play that.
:lol:
"Man is the most insane species. He worships an invisible god and destroys a visible nature. Unaware that this nature he's destroying is this god he's worshipping." - Hubert Reeves

User avatar
Miza
Vintage Post Junkie
Vintage Post Junkie
Posts: 2123
Joined: Mon Oct 29, 2007 1:07 pm
Location: Hamilton
Has liked: 536 times
Been liked: 188 times

Re: Return of the Gibson shocker thread!

Post by Miza »

To be fair, they're simply doing a reissue of the guitar that was the personal favorite of the man who gave it its name. Nothing wrong with that.

Check out the comments; there's clearly a lot of love for that model.

Personally I think Gibson should stick to recreating their classics and leave innovation to PRS or Ibanez. Some may disagree, but really, guitar technology peaked in the 60s didn't it?
Nothing to see here.

User avatar
GrantB
ADMIN
Posts: 14441
Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2003 9:04 am
Location: Where I need to be
Has liked: 968 times
Been liked: 1704 times
Contact:

Re: Return of the Gibson shocker thread!

Post by GrantB »

Not sure about about the peak timing (Floyd, scalloped boards, active pickups, Sustainer etc etc) but Gibson is useless at meaningful innovation...it's because they don't have guitar players running the company.
"Man is the most insane species. He worships an invisible god and destroys a visible nature. Unaware that this nature he's destroying is this god he's worshipping." - Hubert Reeves

User avatar
The Scarecrow
Dial Them Mids IN!
Posts: 3371
Joined: Tue Sep 09, 2003 3:40 pm
Has liked: 158 times
Been liked: 142 times
Contact:

Re: Return of the Gibson shocker thread!

Post by The Scarecrow »

*UNIQUE* wrote:because they don't have guitar players running the company.
I think that's the problem with a lot of the brands really.... but Gibson seems to be championing the trend.

Agree about them sticking to the 'classics' though... I mean, you like a LP or SG because that's what it is right?
http://www.facebook.com/#!/pages/The-Al ... 895?ref=ts

Trade Me: The_Scarecrow

"Friends don't let friends scoop mids."

User avatar
GrantB
ADMIN
Posts: 14441
Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2003 9:04 am
Location: Where I need to be
Has liked: 968 times
Been liked: 1704 times
Contact:

Re: Return of the Gibson shocker thread!

Post by GrantB »

And I suppose Ted McCarty and Leo never played guitars....but somehow they knew what guitarists wanted.

This from Wiki about Ted - "He instead talked with every guitarist he could in order to find out what guitar players were interested in."



Anyway, break a leg Gibson. I'm not a "buying new" customer of yours...
"Man is the most insane species. He worships an invisible god and destroys a visible nature. Unaware that this nature he's destroying is this god he's worshipping." - Hubert Reeves

User avatar
Sustainz
Squier
Posts: 384
Joined: Fri Feb 22, 2013 10:21 pm
Location: Rotovegas
Has liked: 23 times
Been liked: 6 times

Re: Return of the Gibson shocker thread!

Post by Sustainz »

Doesn't phase me one way or the other. I'm not looking for innovation; obviously, some (a lot of?) people are, and that's cool. I go for a sound I first heard 35 years ago, so innovation not required.

As far as this axe - not my cuppa. As long as nobody's holding a gun to my head forcing me to buy one, all is right with the world. It's all about choice; the more, the better. A company that meets market demands will thrive; companies that don't will go the way of the dinosaur.
Play what you love. Practice what you must ~ Larry Carlton

Post Reply