Finding the Right Fuzz Pedal

Gear Aquisition Syndrome is a serious disorder.... FX etc

Moderators: Slowy, Capt. Black

User avatar
Darth Sabbathi
Vintage Post Junkie
Vintage Post Junkie
Posts: 1588
meble-kuchenne.warszawa.pl
Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2015 9:43 pm
Has liked: 195 times
Been liked: 374 times

Re: Finding the Right Fuzz Pedal

Post by Darth Sabbathi »

Fuzz is a very subjective thing in my experience. Personally I really like something with a fair amount of spit and a lot of girth - I don't really do the Gilmour tone type of thing. But if that is your bag, I would say a Ram's Head style big muff would be the go. The best one I've tried is the violet Rams Head from Tym Guitars in Australia, but they are hard to get a hold of:

https://tymguitars.com.au/collections/e ... etramshead (all of his Big Muffs are good - I've also tried the reverse and the civil war, but this was my fave)

If you want the versatile muff-with-mids thing, the EQD Hoof is my pick.

As Danny suggests, a fuzz face is a good all round option too. If you want something that is not too woolly, I'd go with a silicon version - BC108 or BC183 transistors. The Skreddy Lunar Module would be excellent if you want something spendy. Solid Gold FX 'If 6 Was 9' is a good option too.

Edit: the other thing I would say, whatever pedal you get, try it with a bunch of different configurations. Fuzz pedals are wildly sensitive to all sorts of factors - the amount of gain, the input level, the kind of pickup, the amp, etc. Particularly gain and input level - try it out with clean vs overdriven amp, and try rolling off your guitar volume. Those things can make a huge difference.

User avatar
bender
Darth Fader
Posts: 11838
Joined: Fri Feb 02, 2007 12:46 pm
Location: Dorkland
Has liked: 415 times
Been liked: 1010 times

Re: Finding the Right Fuzz Pedal

Post by bender »

Darth Sabbathi wrote:Fuzz is a very subjective thing in my experience. Personally I really like something with a fair amount of spit and a lot of girth - I don't really do the Gilmour tone type of thing. But if that is your bag, I would say a Ram's Head style big muff would be the go. The best one I've tried is the violet Rams Head from Tym Guitars in Australia, but they are hard to get a hold of:

https://tymguitars.com.au/collections/e ... etramshead (all of his Big Muffs are good - I've also tried the reverse and the civil war, but this was my fave)

If you want the versatile muff-with-mids thing, the EQD Hoof is my pick.

As Danny suggests, a fuzz face is a good all round option too. If you want something that is not too woolly, I'd go with a silicon version - BC108 or BC183 transistors. The Skreddy Lunar Module would be excellent if you want something spendy. Solid Gold FX 'If 6 Was 9' is a good option too.

Edit: the other thing I would say, whatever pedal you get, try it with a bunch of different configurations. Fuzz pedals are wildly sensitive to all sorts of factors - the amount of gain, the input level, the kind of pickup, the amp, etc. Particularly gain and input level - try it out with clean vs overdriven amp, and try rolling off your guitar volume. Those things can make a huge difference.
I was at Tym guitars on Friday! Great shop!

User avatar
dayl
Vintage Post Junkie
Vintage Post Junkie
Posts: 5253
Joined: Tue Sep 02, 2008 6:40 pm
Has liked: 446 times
Been liked: 384 times

Re: Finding the Right Fuzz Pedal

Post by dayl »

This is what I use. AMazing fuzz pedal and able to be tone shaped a lot. The boost is a great bonus by itself when it isnt mixed up in things. Dial the gain back and it does really nice things to a clean signal :thumbup:


User avatar
Reg18
Vintage Post Junkie
Vintage Post Junkie
Posts: 3657
Joined: Thu Feb 06, 2014 1:57 pm
Has liked: 312 times
Been liked: 928 times

Re: Finding the Right Fuzz Pedal

Post by Reg18 »

im itching to get another Fuzz on my board and I think A Tonebender build could be in my future!
Fuzz experts here, in short what are the differences between Mk1, 1.5, 2 etc?
I think the MK11 sounds like what most pedal like?

User avatar
Darth Sabbathi
Vintage Post Junkie
Vintage Post Junkie
Posts: 1588
Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2015 9:43 pm
Has liked: 195 times
Been liked: 374 times

Re: Finding the Right Fuzz Pedal

Post by Darth Sabbathi »

Reg18 wrote:im itching to get another Fuzz on my board and I think A Tonebender build could be in my future!
Fuzz experts here, in short what are the differences between Mk1, 1.5, 2 etc?
I think the MK11 sounds like what most pedal like?
Now I can really bore your socks off!

The MkI is a really primitive device - it was based on the Maestro Fuzz Tone (the original fuzz pedal), but the idea was to give it more sustain. They are really spitty and nasty, and you can get gating at certain attack level settings. Good ones have a lot of heft to the tone. These are my personal favourite - they've had a bit of a renaissance in the boutique era. In my experience you have to roll your guitar volume off to get the best out of them - with humbuckers, they just totally flub out at full. Mick Ronson is the classic reference.

The 1.5 is basically the same as a Fuzz Face - there is debate as to which came first. There are a few component differences, but both have two transistors (most Tone Benders have three). There is also the Vox Tone Bender, which is a variant of the 1.5 - they tend to be a bit more trebly. Think Robbie Krieger or Ron Asheton (Stooges).

The MkII is the early Led Zep sound. This, a telecaster and a Supro amp = Communication Breakdown. Lots of people dig them, but not my bag. Very vintage sounding, but better behaved than the MkI.

MkIIIs and MkIVs are very similar to each other, and have a fuller, smoother sound than the MkII, but still with a fair amount of grit. Unlike earlier models, they actually have a tone control. They can get very bitey and thin sounding at the top end of the tone - unpleasantly so in my book - but they sound great from 12 o'clock through to full (they usually go treble to bass clockwise). I like these a lot, second only to MkIs. The Burns Buzzaround and Elka Dizzy Tone are close relatives, and are both bad-ass devices. Jimmy Page used a MkIII on later Zep recordings (from around 1970 I think?). Robert Fripp is closely associated with the Buzzaround.

After the MkIV you have the Supa Tone Bender and Jumbo Tone Bender - but these are both much closer to the Big Muff than other Tone Benders (they're based on that circuit).

Hope that helps. Tone Benders rule. You should definitely try one! If you're looking for a really good one at a fair price, I highly recommend Super Electric - you can find them on Reverb. Made by a guy in Ireland named Jimmy Behan. From the more mass produced end, Basic Audio do a good MkIII (Scarab) and MkI (Marq One). Magnetic Effects (guy from The Datsuns) does a MkII (Solar Bender). There have been a couple of Klinger pedals listed on Trade Me recently - they are well regarded (made in Australia). There is also a 65 Amps Color Bender (MkII) currently on TM, which would probably be good. The current DAM built ones from Macaris are brilliant, but insanely expensive. At all costs avoid the British Pedal Company/JMI (same company, different names)...

User avatar
Reg18
Vintage Post Junkie
Vintage Post Junkie
Posts: 3657
Joined: Thu Feb 06, 2014 1:57 pm
Has liked: 312 times
Been liked: 928 times

Re: Finding the Right Fuzz Pedal

Post by Reg18 »

Darth Sabbathi wrote:
Reg18 wrote:im itching to get another Fuzz on my board and I think A Tonebender build could be in my future!
Fuzz experts here, in short what are the differences between Mk1, 1.5, 2 etc?
I think the MK11 sounds like what most pedal like?
Now I can really bore your socks off!

The MkI is a really primitive device - it was based on the Maestro Fuzz Tone (the original fuzz pedal), but the idea was to give it more sustain. They are really spitty and nasty, and you can get gating at certain attack level settings. Good ones have a lot of heft to the tone. These are my personal favourite - they've had a bit of a renaissance in the boutique era. In my experience you have to roll your guitar volume off to get the best out of them - with humbuckers, they just totally flub out at full. Mick Ronson is the classic reference.

The 1.5 is basically the same as a Fuzz Face - there is debate as to which came first. There are a few component differences, but both have two transistors (most Tone Benders have three). There is also the Vox Tone Bender, which is a variant of the 1.5 - they tend to be a bit more trebly. Think Robbie Krieger or Ron Asheton (Stooges).

The MkII is the early Led Zep sound. This, a telecaster and a Supro amp = Communication Breakdown. Lots of people dig them, but not my bag. Very vintage sounding, but better behaved than the MkI.

MkIIIs and MkIVs are very similar to each other, and have a fuller, smoother sound than the MkII, but still with a fair amount of grit. Unlike earlier models, they actually have a tone control. They can get very bitey and thin sounding at the top end of the tone - unpleasantly so in my book - but they sound great from 12 o'clock through to full (they usually go treble to bass clockwise). I like these a lot, second only to MkIs. The Burns Buzzaround and Elka Dizzy Tone are close relatives, and are both bad-ass devices. Jimmy Page used a MkIII on later Zep recordings (from around 1970 I think?). Robert Fripp is closely associated with the Buzzaround.

After the MkIV you have the Supa Tone Bender and Jumbo Tone Bender - but these are both much closer to the Big Muff than other Tone Benders (they're based on that circuit).

Hope that helps. Tone Benders rule. You should definitely try one! If you're looking for a really good one at a fair price, I highly recommend Super Electric - you can find them on Reverb. Made by a guy in Ireland named Jimmy Behan. From the more mass produced end, Basic Audio do a good MkIII (Scarab) and MkI (Marq One). Magnetic Effects (guy from The Datsuns) does a MkII (Solar Bender). There have been a couple of Klinger pedals listed on Trade Me recently - they are well regarded (made in Australia). There is also a 65 Amps Color Bender (MkII) currently on TM, which would probably be good. The current DAM built ones from Macaris are brilliant, but insanely expensive. At all costs avoid the British Pedal Company/JMI (same company, different names)...
This is great reading! In listening to some demos online the MK1 is more responsive but has a little less bass?
MK11 seems to be a bit thicker but at the cost of dynamics?
Are the model of Germanium Transisters crucial to the sound?

User avatar
Darth Sabbathi
Vintage Post Junkie
Vintage Post Junkie
Posts: 1588
Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2015 9:43 pm
Has liked: 195 times
Been liked: 374 times

Re: Finding the Right Fuzz Pedal

Post by Darth Sabbathi »

MkIs vary a lot - the good ones (at least, the ones I like) have a decent amount of girth. And yes, MkIIs are less responsive - they can get woolly too. MkIs cut better in my experience.

The transistors probably don't make as much difference as fuzz fanatics believe - the skill of the builder and the way they tune the pedal has more impact. They do have different characteristics, but its subjective as to what is best - lots of people love OC81D transistors, but I didn't find them particularly inspiring in the two pedals I had with them, and on the whole I'd say I prefer OC75s. Anything Mullard or NKT is usually a good bet - but it takes someone with some skill and experience to select the good ones.

User avatar
bender
Darth Fader
Posts: 11838
Joined: Fri Feb 02, 2007 12:46 pm
Location: Dorkland
Has liked: 415 times
Been liked: 1010 times

Re: Finding the Right Fuzz Pedal

Post by bender »

How does my Super Electric Dizzy Tone fit into that?

User avatar
jeremyb
Chorus of Organs
Posts: 40878
Joined: Sat Dec 06, 2008 9:03 am
Has liked: 7685 times
Been liked: 4157 times

Re: Finding the Right Fuzz Pedal

Post by jeremyb »

Slowy wrote: That's the problem; everything rewarding is just such hard work. Regret takes much less effort.

User avatar
chur
Vintage Post Junkie
Vintage Post Junkie
Posts: 1268
Joined: Sun Aug 02, 2009 4:05 pm
Location: Christchurch
Has liked: 169 times
Been liked: 210 times

Re: Finding the Right Fuzz Pedal

Post by chur »

Anyone used the fuzz options in the Katana? I haven't myself and have never owned a discrete fuzz pedal, but curious if they approximate the real deal?
No one ever died of hard work.. but why take the risk..

User avatar
KNNZ
Vintage Post Junkie
Vintage Post Junkie
Posts: 2976
Joined: Fri Feb 05, 2016 2:03 pm
Location: Orewa
Has liked: 1777 times
Been liked: 667 times

Re: Finding the Right Fuzz Pedal

Post by KNNZ »

Wren and Cuff do some mean fuzz boxes

User avatar
Darth Sabbathi
Vintage Post Junkie
Vintage Post Junkie
Posts: 1588
Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2015 9:43 pm
Has liked: 195 times
Been liked: 374 times

Re: Finding the Right Fuzz Pedal

Post by Darth Sabbathi »

bender wrote:How does my Super Electric Dizzy Tone fit into that?
It is in the MkIII family, based on the Elka Dizzy Tone. The Baldwin-Burns Buzzaround is rumoured to have been created by the inventor of the Tone Bender, Gary Hurst. According to the rumour, the design then got appropriated by Sola Sound and turned into the MkIII, by which time it had been refined with the addition of the tone control. I don't know exactly where the Dizzy Tone fits in the history, but they were made in Italy around 1967, and have basically the same circuit as the Buzzaround with slightly different component values. Both pedals have kind of weird controls - Sustain (fuzz level), Balance (a bias control for the Q3 transistor) and Timbre (which I think is basically a high pass filter).

You still thinking of selling that?

User avatar
bender
Darth Fader
Posts: 11838
Joined: Fri Feb 02, 2007 12:46 pm
Location: Dorkland
Has liked: 415 times
Been liked: 1010 times

Re: Finding the Right Fuzz Pedal

Post by bender »

Darth Sabbathi wrote:
bender wrote:How does my Super Electric Dizzy Tone fit into that?
It is in the MkIII family, based on the Elka Dizzy Tone. The Baldwin-Burns Buzzaround is rumoured to have been created by the inventor of the Tone Bender, Gary Hurst. According to the rumour, the design then got appropriated by Sola Sound and turned into the MkIII, by which time it had been refined with the addition of the tone control. I don't know exactly where the Dizzy Tone fits in the history, but they were made in Italy around 1967, and have basically the same circuit as the Buzzaround with slightly different component values. Both pedals have kind of weird controls - Sustain (fuzz level), Balance (a bias control for the Q3 transistor) and Timbre (which I think is basically a high pass filter).

You still thinking of selling that?
Thinking about it- I’m very happy with my silverpistol Orion

User avatar
Terexgeek
Vintage Post Junkie
Vintage Post Junkie
Posts: 4617
Joined: Sat Sep 02, 2006 11:12 pm
Location: Christchurch
Has liked: 1224 times
Been liked: 375 times

Re: Finding the Right Fuzz Pedal

Post by Terexgeek »

Thanks Darth, I have learnt a lot about fuzz on this thread, cheers! :thumbup:
Tin arse!!

User avatar
Reg18
Vintage Post Junkie
Vintage Post Junkie
Posts: 3657
Joined: Thu Feb 06, 2014 1:57 pm
Has liked: 312 times
Been liked: 928 times

Re: Finding the Right Fuzz Pedal

Post by Reg18 »

Ok so all this fuzz talk and having some birthday cash floating around, has resulted in me commissioning this pedal!
Zeppelin inspired tones with a blues breaker on one side running at 18v via a charge pump with an added bass control, and a Mk2 Germanium Tone Bender on the other side. Will be a toggle to switch the order of which comes first too!

Image

Post Reply