I liked the soundblaster too, sounded "WARMER!"Kloppsta wrote:lol...there u go, thats just it! you liked the sound of the apogee, i liked the soundblaster! it just proves his point i guess. its all relative to the listener and their enviroment. im no noob when it comes to audio interfaces, DAW's and home recording / studio setups in general so i really appreciated the scientific facts behind the panels argument. comb filtering CAN explain probably 95% of what is "percieved" to be "better quality" audio.danrawkz wrote:Thing is, a card like a soundblaster probably sounds ok for acoustic guitar (I thought the Apogee sounded better noticably anyway), but try that with some other instruments :).
Always knew something was fishy about those Led Zepp reversed audio tracks on youtube :lol:
i have to laugh (or i would cry) cause i was one of those people sucked into marketing schemes, forum reccomendations et al. luckily i realised the error of my ways a little while ago and managed to downsize / downgrade in gear price but not, so far it seems, on overall audio quality...so really this video just re-affirms things for me.
I can't believe that jar of stones thing though, and the $1800 power cord, out of it!
Good to re-affirm stuff you've learned the hard way too, lucky I didn't buy those $100 cables and stuck with my PWs!
Do you all reckon the same applies to guitar pedals?
I'm disgusted that a para EQ can cost $449, and a BB preamp can cost $399, a single button to make things louder for $250, in 3 pedals, I've spent more than my amp cost!