NWTFOMGLOLJBPD HD500X Thread

Gear Aquisition Syndrome is a serious disorder.... FX etc

Moderators: Slowy, Capt. Black

Post Reply
hamo
Vintage Post Junkie
Vintage Post Junkie
Posts: 20726
meble-kuchenne.warszawa.pl
Joined: Wed Sep 07, 2005 12:08 pm
Location: Wellington, NZ
Has liked: 638 times
Been liked: 806 times

Re: NWTFOMGLOLJBPD HD500X Thread

Post by hamo »

jeremyb wrote:Still not happy with my dirt tone, not cutting through as well as I'd like, might need to work on some EQ'ing.... I'm also keen to try a FRFR setup...
I remember downloading some of Ross' patches and being shocked at how trebly they sounded on their own, but figured that was what was needed to get cut through with a huge drum/bass sound. Maybe you need to treble it up past what's intuitive? I dunno, I'm guessing here. :P
Aquila Rosso wrote:I don't a mind an iced tea rimjob one little bit :congrats:
Molly wrote:Trousers are no substitute for talent
druz wrote:I present to you, the whogivesafuckocaster

User avatar
jeremyb
Chorus of Organs
Posts: 41156
Joined: Sat Dec 06, 2008 9:03 am
Has liked: 7736 times
Been liked: 4180 times

Re: NWTFOMGLOLJBPD HD500X Thread

Post by jeremyb »

olegmcnoleg wrote:
jeremyb wrote: Yarrrr I bet! Makes them really come alive, the HD500/X is let down by it's cab emulations, lots of people using separate IR loaders for recording etc... so going into an actual amp makes a lotta sense :)
Try going into a Line6 DT amp maybe? The reconfiguring of the power section to suit your modelling choices is actually pretty cool. The amp colours your tone more than a transparent amp of course, but then it offers many colours, not just one.
Mmmm had considered it, but I like the idea of a FRFR speaker, light and portable and I could use it for all sorts of other things too :)
Slowy wrote: That's the problem; everything rewarding is just such hard work. Regret takes much less effort.

User avatar
Eruera
Vintage Post Junkie
Vintage Post Junkie
Posts: 2130
Joined: Sun Nov 11, 2012 9:58 am
Location: Balmy Palmy
Has liked: 3 times
Been liked: 35 times

Re: NWTFOMGLOLJBPD HD500X Thread

Post by Eruera »

The Electro Voice ZLX 12P seem to be among the best regarded budget FRFR options on the fractal forum if that's any help.

User avatar
jeremyb
Chorus of Organs
Posts: 41156
Joined: Sat Dec 06, 2008 9:03 am
Has liked: 7736 times
Been liked: 4180 times

Re: NWTFOMGLOLJBPD HD500X Thread

Post by jeremyb »

Eruera wrote:The Electro Voice ZLX 12P seem to be among the best regarded budget FRFR options on the fractal forum if that's any help.
Interesting, $899 here, not one I've come across yet! I've heard good things about the Alto TS112A & TS115A, even cheaper, ~$499 & 599 here, going to try out the L6 stagesource L2T soon too :)
Slowy wrote: That's the problem; everything rewarding is just such hard work. Regret takes much less effort.

User avatar
Zaulkin
Vintage Post Junkie
Vintage Post Junkie
Posts: 5435
Joined: Thu Nov 27, 2008 4:01 pm
Has liked: 739 times
Been liked: 512 times

Re: NWTFOMGLOLJBPD HD500X Thread

Post by Zaulkin »

That's good to know. I've got a cab with a Beta12CX installed + tweeter disabled. Sounds very much like an amp in the room. With the tweeter on it just sounds overly trebly and harsh. I don't have anything to compare it to at the moment though.

User avatar
opsguy
Fender
Fender
Posts: 587
Joined: Thu May 12, 2005 7:59 pm
Location: Auckland
Has liked: 423 times
Been liked: 94 times

Re: NWTFOMGLOLJBPD HD500X Thread

Post by opsguy »

olegmcnoleg wrote:
jeremyb wrote: Yarrrr I bet! Makes them really come alive, the HD500/X is let down by it's cab emulations, lots of people using separate IR loaders for recording etc... so going into an actual amp makes a lotta sense :)
Try going into a Line6 DT amp maybe? The reconfiguring of the power section to suit your modelling choices is actually pretty cool. The amp colours your tone more than a transparent amp of course, but then it offers many colours, not just one.
This is a good option. I used the HD500/DT amp setup for a couple of years. Line 6 link connection makes for simple setup and given the DT amp is a good amp just on its own if the hd500 breaks during a gig you have an easy backup.

User avatar
stuu
PRS McCarty
Posts: 1190
Joined: Wed Jun 23, 2004 4:05 pm
Has liked: 5 times
Been liked: 6 times

Re: NWTFOMGLOLJBPD HD500X Thread

Post by stuu »

Lunchbox?
PlukkyBoy wrote:My ability as a guitar player is easily outstripped by my abilities as a guitar buyer

User avatar
willow13
Vintage Post Junkie
Vintage Post Junkie
Posts: 14558
Joined: Sun Dec 19, 2004 2:36 pm
Location: If less is more then just think how much more more is
Has liked: 372 times
Been liked: 634 times

Re: NWTFOMGLOLJBPD HD500X Thread

Post by willow13 »

stuu wrote:Lunchbox?
he's a big boy now...doesn't need a lunchbox
If Less is More Then Just Think How Much More More would be

User avatar
Danger Mouse
Vintage Post Junkie
Vintage Post Junkie
Posts: 11535
Joined: Mon Oct 16, 2006 3:32 pm
Location: Jafa Land
Has liked: 353 times
Been liked: 663 times

Re: NWTFOMGLOLJBPD HD500X Thread

Post by Danger Mouse »

hamo wrote:
jeremyb wrote:Still not happy with my dirt tone, not cutting through as well as I'd like, might need to work on some EQ'ing.... I'm also keen to try a FRFR setup...
I remember downloading some of Ross' patches and being shocked at how trebly they sounded on their own, but figured that was what was needed to get cut through with a huge drum/bass sound. Maybe you need to treble it up past what's intuitive? I dunno, I'm guessing here. :P
It's a sound theory, my last guitar teacher had a H&K Switchblade, which was as sharp and trebley as the name would suggest (like being stabbed in the ears with a switchblade), but when he gigged it, it cut through amazingly well.
The older I get, the more disappointed in myself I become.

User avatar
sopachrga
Vintage Post Junkie
Vintage Post Junkie
Posts: 3387
Joined: Mon Oct 31, 2005 3:26 pm
Location: Christchurch
Has liked: 16 times
Been liked: 59 times

Re: NWTFOMGLOLJBPD HD500X Thread

Post by sopachrga »

jeremyb wrote:Still not happy with my dirt tone, not cutting through as well as I'd like, might need to work on some EQ'ing.... I'm also keen to try a FRFR setup...

Wait... isn't your dirt tone just still your Ryan built amp?
You were happy with that amp before, so what has changed? I thought the HD500 was pretty much out of the circuit when on the dirt channel?

Just a thought, have you checked what the input impedance is set to on the HD500? I always found that anything below 1M altered the frequency response in a bad way.
Ummm....

User avatar
jeremyb
Chorus of Organs
Posts: 41156
Joined: Sat Dec 06, 2008 9:03 am
Has liked: 7736 times
Been liked: 4180 times

Re: NWTFOMGLOLJBPD HD500X Thread

Post by jeremyb »

hamo wrote:
jeremyb wrote:Still not happy with my dirt tone, not cutting through as well as I'd like, might need to work on some EQ'ing.... I'm also keen to try a FRFR setup...
I remember downloading some of Ross' patches and being shocked at how trebly they sounded on their own, but figured that was what was needed to get cut through with a huge drum/bass sound. Maybe you need to treble it up past what's intuitive? I dunno, I'm guessing here. :P
Might be onto something there!
Slowy wrote: That's the problem; everything rewarding is just such hard work. Regret takes much less effort.

User avatar
jeremyb
Chorus of Organs
Posts: 41156
Joined: Sat Dec 06, 2008 9:03 am
Has liked: 7736 times
Been liked: 4180 times

Re: NWTFOMGLOLJBPD HD500X Thread

Post by jeremyb »

sopachrga wrote:
jeremyb wrote:Still not happy with my dirt tone, not cutting through as well as I'd like, might need to work on some EQ'ing.... I'm also keen to try a FRFR setup...

Wait... isn't your dirt tone just still your Ryan built amp?
You were happy with that amp before, so what has changed? I thought the HD500 was pretty much out of the circuit when on the dirt channel?

Just a thought, have you checked what the input impedance is set to on the HD500? I always found that anything below 1M altered the frequency response in a bad way.
Got the impedance at 1M, but it's probably to do with how I'm boosting the amp, using a cranked boost comp as I didn't like any of the od pedals, might have to revisit them :)
Slowy wrote: That's the problem; everything rewarding is just such hard work. Regret takes much less effort.

User avatar
godgrinder
Vintage Post Junkie
Vintage Post Junkie
Posts: 1709
Joined: Wed Dec 07, 2011 4:49 pm
Location: 09
Has liked: 28 times
Been liked: 594 times

Re: NWTFOMGLOLJBPD HD500X Thread

Post by godgrinder »

jeremyb wrote:but it's probably to do with how I'm boosting the amp, using a cranked boost comp
Sounds like a bad idea. The Jose type circuitry already has TONS of compression going on.

Try using a parametric or graphic EQ in the HD500 as a boost if you don't dig OD pedals.
Amps:
Soldano SLO100 x2 | Wizard MC1 & MC2 | Diezel Herbert
Fryette Pittbull CL | Marshall 2203KK | Krank Rev 50 | Mesa Mark 2A

Rack stuff:
VHT/Fryette GP3, GP/DI & 2/90/2 | Peters FSM/Chimera
Verellen Meatsmoke | Synergy SYN1 | Mesa Studio

User avatar
jeremyb
Chorus of Organs
Posts: 41156
Joined: Sat Dec 06, 2008 9:03 am
Has liked: 7736 times
Been liked: 4180 times

Re: NWTFOMGLOLJBPD HD500X Thread

Post by jeremyb »

Setup some patches last night with amps and cabs on them, sounded pretty good thru the headphones, then tonight we had practice thru an interface and into the PA, e-kit, the works, was pretty cool, much quieter than normal and we could all hear each other clearly, would trade again! And the HD sounded pretty darn good too!
Slowy wrote: That's the problem; everything rewarding is just such hard work. Regret takes much less effort.

User avatar
stuu
PRS McCarty
Posts: 1190
Joined: Wed Jun 23, 2004 4:05 pm
Has liked: 5 times
Been liked: 6 times

Re: NWTFOMGLOLJBPD HD500X Thread

Post by stuu »

Thats a great result. We're looking at using a jamhub (w/ my helix, a vetta, and a bass flyrig) for writing. Just need half decent eDrums now. What kind is your drummer using?
PlukkyBoy wrote:My ability as a guitar player is easily outstripped by my abilities as a guitar buyer

Post Reply