NZGuitars.com

benderissimo wrote:I found some of this thread quite confusing. Molly and Slowy seemed to be having an argument while, at the same time, making exactly the same point...

I don't think we were having an argument. I accept there would be a legal position and the original owner would have rights accordingly. I'd just want the appropriate evidence (as would anybody I assume).

Molly wrote:

benderissimo wrote:I found some of this thread quite confusing. Molly and Slowy seemed to be having an argument while, at the same time, making exactly the same point...

I don't think we were having an argument. I accept there would be a legal position and the original owner would have rights accordingly. I'd just want the appropriate evidence (as would anybody I assume).

Which is what he said too (at least in terms of the proof bit). Don't mind me though- I'm just musing.

Argument was clearly way too strong a word too.

S'OK. It's an interesting topic. Keen to see how Mathew gets on.

Quite keen to see if you get it back

benderissimo wrote:

Molly wrote:

benderissimo wrote:I found some of this thread quite confusing. Molly and Slowy seemed to be having an argument while, at the same time, making exactly the same point...

I don't think we were having an argument. I accept there would be a legal position and the original owner would have rights accordingly. I'd just want the appropriate evidence (as would anybody I assume).

Which is what he said too (at least in terms of the proof bit). Don't mind me though- I'm just musing.

Argument was clearly way too strong a word too.

I think our POV's converged far too quickly for there to be any suggestion of dissent.
Though I confess to having a short fuse at the moment. Convalescence is driving me nuts and things like thieves and crappy, unreliable Samsung phones are providing me plenty of opportunities to feel utterly pissed off.

benderissimo wrote:I found some of this thread quite confusing. Molly and Slowy seemed to be having an argument while, at the same time, making exactly the same point...

I agree with you!!!
SHUT UP!!!

Following this thread.

Slowy go to the merchant bar tonight. Pub quiz is on. You'll love it.

SimpleSi wrote:Quite keen to see if you get it back

Not comment related but that is a mean looking Tele in your profile pic. Got any bigger images to drawl over (strictly talking about pictures of that guitar)

The fellow has removed the listing from TradeMe and am discussing what happens from here.

ToneLoungeMatt wrote:

SimpleSi wrote:Quite keen to see if you get it back

Not comment related but that is a mean looking Tele in your profile pic. Got any bigger images to drawl over (strictly talking about pictures of that guitar)

http://imgur.com/a/lIOXp

SimpleSi wrote: http://imgur.com/a/lIOXp

Well that's just simply awesome!

What a stunner!

SimpleSi wrote:

ToneLoungeMatt wrote:

SimpleSi wrote:Quite keen to see if you get it back

Not comment related but that is a mean looking Tele in your profile pic. Got any bigger images to drawl over (strictly talking about pictures of that guitar)

http://imgur.com/a/lIOXp

Oh my goodness.....

vintage52 wrote:

SimpleSi wrote: http://imgur.com/a/lIOXp

Well that's just simply awesome!

What a stunner!

Indeed... Got me thinking about my own Tele requirements now.

Molly wrote:
Indeed... Got me thinking about my own Tele requirements now.

Didn't you just sell one?

vintage52 wrote:

Molly wrote:
Indeed... Got me thinking about my own Tele requirements now.

Didn't you just sell one?

Yes. That's why I have Tele requirements.

I just want a bit of a project Tele I think.

EDIT: Apologies for taking the thread off topic