Rosewood vs Maple fretboard
Moderators: Slowy, Capt. Black
-
- Fender
- Posts: 528
- meble-kuchenne.warszawa.pl
- Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2017 4:07 pm
- Has liked: 14 times
- Been liked: 63 times
Rosewood vs Maple fretboard
Which do you prefer and why?
personally i have always slightly favored maple (roasted) as i like the sleek feel over the board.
Especially when it comes to speed work. Any tonal difference i find i can compensate with my pedals and amp.Keen to hear your guys opinions Obviously its much an each to their own.
personally i have always slightly favored maple (roasted) as i like the sleek feel over the board.
Especially when it comes to speed work. Any tonal difference i find i can compensate with my pedals and amp.Keen to hear your guys opinions Obviously its much an each to their own.
- StrummersOfThunder
- Vintage Post Junkie
- Posts: 7163
- Joined: Sun Jul 15, 2012 2:23 pm
- Has liked: 808 times
- Been liked: 1298 times
Re: Rosewood vs Maple fretboard
Look and feel I prefer rosewood but once you add in a reverb tank, snarling death Vox, mic from amp to pa, drunk crowd yelling and someone rearing your face off with a bridge filtertron then I think the subtle tonal differences are lost on me ....
- Zaulkin
- Vintage Post Junkie
- Posts: 5426
- Joined: Thu Nov 27, 2008 4:01 pm
- Has liked: 738 times
- Been liked: 511 times
Re: Rosewood vs Maple fretboard
I guess maple has a slightly more firm feel and rosewood is a bit softer to the touch. Amazing how we notice a difference given how little we actually touch the board given that the strings are in the way. Out of those two I'd pick maple for feel and rosewood for sound. Pau Ferro is my favourite so far as it just feels so damn smooth and sounds great!
In terms of sound I believe the consensus that rosewood is warmer than maple, but saying that I've played extremely bright rosewood fretboard guitars and dull sounding maple ones. I suppose it's all the factors that come together!
In terms of sound I believe the consensus that rosewood is warmer than maple, but saying that I've played extremely bright rosewood fretboard guitars and dull sounding maple ones. I suppose it's all the factors that come together!
-
- Fender
- Posts: 528
- Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2017 4:07 pm
- Has liked: 14 times
- Been liked: 63 times
Re: Rosewood vs Maple fretboard
Hey Nik. Agree on the smoothness of the Pau Ferro - so damn smooth!
In terms of tone - generally speaking there is nothing some EQ cant fix in most cases (in my experience)
I suppose there will be CITES issues bring in pau ferro boards as it may resemble rosewood in looks in their eyes?
In terms of tone - generally speaking there is nothing some EQ cant fix in most cases (in my experience)
I suppose there will be CITES issues bring in pau ferro boards as it may resemble rosewood in looks in their eyes?
- Conway
- Vintage Post Junkie
- Posts: 9837
- Joined: Mon Aug 29, 2011 1:33 pm
- Location: Auckland
- Has liked: 242 times
- Been liked: 966 times
Re: Rosewood vs Maple fretboard
I think maple on single coils gives more snap and bite, which is a good thing. On humbuckers, ebony is nice.
- Slowy
- Vintage Post Junkie
- Posts: 22640
- Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 4:13 pm
- Location: Orcland
- Has liked: 1011 times
- Been liked: 2466 times
Re: Rosewood vs Maple fretboard
Always preferred Rosewood just because. Being ham fisted, I tear great holes in maple boards which is great if you like the chewed look, tragic if you don't.
But for all my opinions on the differences and why, I've never been able to provide myself with any supporting evidence at all.
Maple board on a Les Paul looks plain wrong.
And that's all I have to say about that.
But for all my opinions on the differences and why, I've never been able to provide myself with any supporting evidence at all.
Maple board on a Les Paul looks plain wrong.
And that's all I have to say about that.
Beyond a critical point within a finite space, freedom diminishes as numbers increase. This is as true of humans as it is of gas molecules in a sealed flask. The human question is not how many can possibly survive within the system, but what kind of existence is possible for those who so survive.
- Dharmajester
- Vintage Post Junkie
- Posts: 1587
- Joined: Sun Apr 05, 2015 8:44 am
- Location: Dunedin
- Has liked: 273 times
- Been liked: 377 times
Re: Rosewood vs Maple fretboard
Agreed Maple appears to have more snap on singles however the luthier consensus seems to be that Maple cuts through due to an abundance of upper mids. Rosewood on the other hand has a more extended top and bottom so is in fact technically the brighter and simultaneously the warmer of the two. Looking forward to trying Pau Fero as its has pants'd the Rosewood in all the online comparisons I've seen ( could have been slanted though )
“The music business is a cruel and shallow money trench - a long plastic hallway where thieves and pimps run free and good men die like dogs. There's also a negative side."
Hunter S. Thompson
Hunter S. Thompson
- willow13
- Vintage Post Junkie
- Posts: 14558
- Joined: Sun Dec 19, 2004 2:36 pm
- Location: If less is more then just think how much more more is
- Has liked: 372 times
- Been liked: 634 times
Re: Rosewood vs Maple fretboard
I think given that maple "generally" has a finish on it then it will feel very different for that reason. Personally I find my guitars with maple fretboards have a high end (as others have said ) "snap" than rosewood doesn't so I like that.....and tone wise my eyes tell me Maple is WAY better
When it comes to "feel" I think for me Ebony is the best under finger feel, but I prefer the maple look
When it comes to "feel" I think for me Ebony is the best under finger feel, but I prefer the maple look
If Less is More Then Just Think How Much More More would be
- willow13
- Vintage Post Junkie
- Posts: 14558
- Joined: Sun Dec 19, 2004 2:36 pm
- Location: If less is more then just think how much more more is
- Has liked: 372 times
- Been liked: 634 times
Re: Rosewood vs Maple fretboard
this makes sense really....if you are trying to cut through in a mix you in general boost the mids. My solo boost has WAY more Mids than my standard rhythm tone for that reasonDharmajester wrote:Agreed Maple appears to have more snap on singles however the luthier consensus seems to be that Maple cuts through due to an abundance of upper mids. Rosewood on the other hand has a more extended top and bottom so is in fact technically the brighter and simultaneously the warmer of the two.
If Less is More Then Just Think How Much More More would be
- Molly
- Vintage Post Junkie
- Posts: 24937
- Joined: Sat Dec 21, 2013 12:17 pm
- Has liked: 2482 times
- Been liked: 2794 times
Re: Rosewood vs Maple fretboard
And then there's round-laminate and flat-laminate to further confuse matters. In round-lam the frets in a rosewood board might actually be in contact with the maple. Guess it all makes some or other difference.
I can't say I'd tell the difference in a blind test. In sound or feel.
I can't say I'd tell the difference in a blind test. In sound or feel.
- Slowy
- Vintage Post Junkie
- Posts: 22640
- Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 4:13 pm
- Location: Orcland
- Has liked: 1011 times
- Been liked: 2466 times
Re: Rosewood vs Maple fretboard
Emperor's new clothes ........
There are so many areas like this where we desperately look for things that don't actually exist in order to justify our preferences. Tele through-body or top load is another example. There's no damn difference that any mortal could detect in a blind test but regardless, you should absolutely choose the one you prefer.
Shit! Is this the onset of Grumpy Old Man syndrome?
There are so many areas like this where we desperately look for things that don't actually exist in order to justify our preferences. Tele through-body or top load is another example. There's no damn difference that any mortal could detect in a blind test but regardless, you should absolutely choose the one you prefer.
Shit! Is this the onset of Grumpy Old Man syndrome?
Beyond a critical point within a finite space, freedom diminishes as numbers increase. This is as true of humans as it is of gas molecules in a sealed flask. The human question is not how many can possibly survive within the system, but what kind of existence is possible for those who so survive.
- Molly
- Vintage Post Junkie
- Posts: 24937
- Joined: Sat Dec 21, 2013 12:17 pm
- Has liked: 2482 times
- Been liked: 2794 times
Re: Rosewood vs Maple fretboard
Pah... You'll be telling me next that paying the extra for a long tennon Les Paul is a waste of money. Or that hand-wound pickups have the same mojo as machine-wound.Slowy wrote:Emperor's new clothes ........
There are so many areas like this where we desperately look for things that don't actually exist in order to justify our preferences. Tele through-body or top load is another example. There's no damn difference that any mortal could detect in a blind test but regardless, you should absolutely choose the one you prefer.
Shit! Is this the onset of Grumpy Old Man syndrome?
- Slowy
- Vintage Post Junkie
- Posts: 22640
- Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 4:13 pm
- Location: Orcland
- Has liked: 1011 times
- Been liked: 2466 times
Re: Rosewood vs Maple fretboard
Molly wrote: Pah... You'll be telling me next that paying the extra for a long tennon Les Paul is a waste of money. Or that hand-wound pickups have the same mojo as machine-wound.
The former is a question of sound engineering. ( )
The latter, yep 'fraid so. (Says the guy who loves Lollar pickups)
Beyond a critical point within a finite space, freedom diminishes as numbers increase. This is as true of humans as it is of gas molecules in a sealed flask. The human question is not how many can possibly survive within the system, but what kind of existence is possible for those who so survive.